[Spellyans] Dan's dissernya
Michael Everson
everson at evertype.com
Tue May 26 20:39:35 BST 2009
I'm not sure what your point is. Perhaps my point was not clear. It is
dis-cernya and con-cernya; it could not be consernya in KS as that
would give [kᵿnˈzǝɹnjə] so it should be discernya not dissernya
in the SWF.
On 26 May 2009, at 19:59, nicholas williams wrote:
> In the texts this word appears as:
>
> decernya x 1
> descernya x 2
> discernya x 1
> desernya x 1
> thesernya x 1
>
> Concernya is attested x 3 and consernya x 4
>
> Nicholas
>
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Spellyans
mailing list