Yeah, but we have OM <lyf> and we have Lhuyd's <lyv>, so I would think that on balance were better off with <lyv> for this word. On 11 Mar 2009, at 14:29, Nicholas Williams wrote: > In a word, no. Lywe, lyw and lew appear to have a final [w]. So there > were probably two form lyw and lyv. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com