[Spellyans] kal revisited

[nicholas williams]

KS as it is constituted at the moment is close to the SWF Traditional,  
which means
a. that learners of the SWF will find it easy to read
b. that there is a greater chance of eventual revisions of the SWF  
bringing it closer to KS.

It is also incidentally close to Jenner.

It is unlikely that any further change will be made to KS.

I am not wholly happy with some aspects of KS, but it seems to me a  
reasonable compromise and I am
content to write in it and publish in it.

Nicholas


On 5 Jan 2009, at 19:17, Eddie Climo wrote:

> I am beginning to wonder if we might not be going too far with KS.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20090105/50317e7e/attachment.html>