[Spellyans] Goat

[Daniel Prohaska]

Yes, I would like to know this, too. Weren't we promised the minutes of the
AHG meetings? Isn't there a video of it as well? Albert, who was there,
specifically mentions Andrew Climo being unhappy about Trond's ruling. I
have no reason to doubt Albert's word in this.

Dan 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Weatherhill
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:22 PM



"Have Trond's rulings ever been written down and circulated?  If not, then
they count for nothing and are merely hearsay.  We cannot progress on such a
basis.  Also, if they have not been officially recorded, why not?

Craig"

 

On 7 Ebr 2009, at 12:11, nicholas williams wrote:

 

> 

> KK as the basis? This is the first I have heard of such a ruling.

> The Commission's report said nothing of the kind.

> KD was to be the basis.

> 

> 

> 

> On 6 Apr 2009, at 23:42, Michael Everson wrote:

> 

>>> Now this is not in the spec but Trond's ruling was that the KK  

>>> form is to be taken as the basis and if it is found linguistically  

>>> faulty or inauthentic, or in violation of the SWF specification,  

>>> changed.

>>> 

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Spellyans mailing list

> Spellyans at kernowek.net

> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

 

 

_______________________________________________

Spellyans mailing list

Spellyans at kernowek.net

http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20090407/0a3223b2/attachment.html>