[Spellyans] SWF questionable wordforms
Daniel Prohaska
daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Wed Sep 17 13:43:24 IST 2008
By SWF rules we ought to write <faladow>, and since this is also attested
it's fine. I see no need to change it.
Dan
_____
From: nicholas williams
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:49 AM
But note he also writes <faladov> at BM 812 & 1820 and faladov occurs at BK
20.
The spelling <falladow> occurs 25 times in the Ordinalia, BK and CW.
Jordan writes <falladowe> five times.
If we were going by attestation we would write <falladow> not <faladow>.
Nicholas
On 17 Sep 2008, at 08:49, Jon Mills wrote:
Ton, Rad. (1504): falladow; feladow
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080917/a17690b9/attachment.html
More information about the Spellyans
mailing list