[Spellyans] au

[Michael Everson]

On 24 Jul 2008, at 11:04, I wrote:

> At the first meeting of the AHG, Trond used an agenda of issues I  
> had written for him. This did not include any reference to <ai> or  
> <au> because I hadn't thought about them previously and didn't put  
> them on the agenda.

Trond, who evidently reads the archives of Spellyans from time to  
time, contacted me to inform me that while he did request (and  
receive) a document of issues from me in mid-November, he did not use  
it as the basis for his agenda. Rather he asked the AHG as a whole  
what they thought needed to be discussed.

As it happens, the order in which things did get discussed (to judge  
by the debriefings I had each day from Andrew) was (to my mind) the  
same as that of my agenda. Of course that may well be because (1) the  
problems being linguistic were common and (2) the Agan Tavas members  
of the AHG had my list of priorities as well.

I was unaware that Trond had not used the contribution to form the  
agenda. He says he did not, so I must stand corrected.

In any case, the fact that I missed <ai> and <au> in my agenda was  
certainly why they did not get put on the list of issues; had they  
been on my original list Andrew would certainly have brought it up and  
it would have been dealt with by the AHG.

Michael Everson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080730/0a2502f1/attachment.htm>