[Spellyans] KK ha'n SWF
nicholas williams
njawilliams at gmail.com
Tue Aug 5 10:35:59 IST 2008
It isn't "'they'", it's "he". The document was written by Ken George.
I have spent quite enough time in my life pointing out the many
interrelated
errors in "Common Cornish". He is not a professional linguist and his
theories
should have been dismissed by the revival 20 years ago.
There are two remaining questions: First if KK is so good, why does Ken
not actually speak it, rather than a rather anglicised Unified?
Secondly: since the Commission rejected KK as a "construal", why
don't the Cowethas move on?
Nicholas
On 4 Aug 2008, at 20:15, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
> Once again, they go for Nicholas's detailed arguments against Kemmyn
> theory, and offer nothing in response except to say that he is wrong
> (of
> course, they try to brainwash people into thinking that C21 fully
> addresses icholas's p[oints, but it does not even begin to do so,
> which
> they know as well as we do, but they're trapped in their own lie).
> It is
> time, after all these years, for them to PROVE him wrong.
More information about the Spellyans
mailing list